From Steve Grocott:
Colin Harvey's article is spot on. The fledgling writer's need for opinion -
any opinion, however rigid, bigotted or downright crass - can be a curse. It
can constrain imagination and stifle originality. On the other hand it can focus
the mind pretty sharply. A good rule of thumb budding writers have probably
heard before is the one that says you can ignore single comments, but if a few
people are saying similar things then it's time to take notice.
It's important to choose your group wisely. Sad to say, SF/Fantasy groups or
SF writers within groups are among the narrowest minds I've come across in my
undistinguished and totally unpublished writing career. Last year I was part
of a group that imploded on itself and disintegrated, over, I seem to recall,
a mind blowingly important debate as to whether a non SF writer should dare
to crit a cyberpunk story. How mad is that?
Actually, writing is a pretty mad exercise all round. The market for anything
other than Airport style fiction is shrinking by the year, so really, we only
carry on for our own amusement. If we're not already a celeb there's little
chance of earning anything out of it, and we go to critique groups so that at
least someone will read our work. Or we come to websites like this in the sad
hope of getting ourselves noticed. The truth is that the number of writers of
fiction is fast catching up the number of readers, and it will soon find itself
in the same boat as the incestuous world of poetry... mixed metaphors there
- AVOID LIKE A RAGING PLAGUE...
Steve, thanks for your response to Colin's article, "A Sea of Voices." I had a feeling it would
provoke some reaction.
I wonder if your experience in critique groups is typical, or if others have
a less pessimistic view, especially on the prospect for budding authors in
Send your email, either in response to Steve's letter above, or on any subject relevant to TWU, to firstname.lastname@example.org
or click on the CONTACT link to send
us snail mail.